After two months of calls for justice for citizens of color in Connecticut and elsewhere, the state legislature took action. On July 31st, the state’s governor Ned Lamont signed House Bill 6004, “An Act Concerning Police Accountability”. Among its proponents was Will Haskell, a state senator who garnered a lot of attention when he was first elected in 2018 at the age of 22 (and seen above in a 2019 town-hall meeting with State Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff). However, his support of these measures seem to be in conflict with the goal of a bill he put forward earlier this year that also related to the role of the police.
In November of 2019, just ten months after Mr. Haskell was sworn in for his first term, he received a perfect score of 100 from the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters, based on the legislative measures he’d supported during the year with respect to the environment – and a press release about his score made sure to mention how much higher the Democrats’ scores tended to be than Republicans’. The CTLCV listed measures ranging from offshore wind legislation to the much-debated ban on plastic bags as victories – although since its scorecard stated that 17 of the 23 bills it supported didn’t pass, that indicated that there was more work to be done.
In February of 2020, Will Haskell announced that he had sent a letter to the chairs and ranking members of the Environment Committee, requesting that they consider legislation to deal with another issue: the excessive idling of cars. Current law only gives power to the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection to enforce the statute that limits a car’s idling time to three minutes. In a column he wrote for the Wilton Bulletin, Mr. Haskell suggested that local police departments should also be granted this power. He stated that DEEP is supportive of the idea, although the CTLCV has not made any public statement about the legislation yet.
Since that announcement, there has been no further postings about the issue. However, he has been vocal in his support of the bill on police accountability – including through a Facebook video he posted this summer, shortly before the bill was passed and signed into law. There have also been calls to deal with accountability again, with some talk centering on whether cars can be pulled over for minor offenses.
In the case of idling, what complicates matters, naturally, is that the car has already been pulled over. If a police officer was to have a valid claim that unnecessary idling was taking place, that officer would have to watch or film the driver’s car for three straight minutes, without interruption. As we’ve seen, however, many of the tragic encounters between motorists and officers that have received nationwide attention in recent years began with a minor traffic violation. Motorists of color who potentially receive citations for idling could have reason to think that they are being unfairly targeted, just as so many others have been for various traffic violations.
Where did the idea for more police involvement originate? In his column, Mr. Haskell wrote: “After watching cars idle in their school parking lot, students from New Canaan brought this issue to my attention and collaborated with me every step of the way. If the bill receives a public hearing, I’m sure they will continue to make their voices heard.” He doesn’t say anything about the race of the students who spoke with him, but it should be noted that only about 1% of New Canaan High School’s student body is African-American. (The number for Wilton is about 2%.)
For those who think that the likelihood of something like this happening at all is rare, it should be noted that such an incident has already happened – and in of all places, Wilton, which Will Haskell now represents. On February 4th, 2015, a bus driver (who has asked to have his name withheld) drove a team of students from a school in Stamford to Wilton High School. The assignment required him to stay around for a little over two hours, and like other drivers, he chose to stay in his bus during that time. A letter from one coach to others the next day describes what happened while the driver was waiting for the meet to end:
Our driver … was sitting in our bus with the engine running, when a representative of Wilton High School … came up to him and told him he had to shut his engine off. He tried to explain that the weather would make the bus unreasonably cold while he waited, and that he was only turning on the engine for a few minutes at a time, to warm up the bus as needed. Nevertheless, she insisted that the engine stay off, and so he complied. He made it clear that he was not singled out, as he saw the woman go up to other buses outside the school. (She also did not approach them until we had already been at the school for a couple of hours.)
Our bus driver … has always been courteous and respectful. I have also never had any driver inform me before of anyone expecting drivers to sit in the cold. Even if this is not as likely to be an issue next month, I’m still disappointed to hear about this treatment that he received. I want to know if anyone else has heard similar stories from their drivers. I am also hoping that someone from Wilton High School will explain why this happened and why the situation wasn’t handled better.
One reply to the coach’s letter the next day indicated that another team’s coach had heard nothing from her bus driver. The following was the only other reply from the remaining recipients, sent February 9th:
According to the Stamford coach, the driver already knew this and was adhering to the rules. On February 10th, more information was provided by the original writer to fellow coaches:
Furthermore, he told me that she actually banged on his door and was more blatantly rude to him than how I made it sound in my previous e-mail.
I spent parts of Thursday and Friday trying to track down answers. The one piece of the puzzle that would help me would have been the name of the female representative of Wilton High School. I am trying to find out who that might have been.
Doing some investigative work myself, I was told by a bus driver and campus security officer that there is a limit on how long a bus is supposed to idle. After Googling, I found some links to initiatives in the state of Connecticut that seek to eliminate idling buses in school zones due to wasting of fuel and also the possibility of air pollution being drawn into HVAC systems and degrading Indoor Air Quality.
The coach then gave a description of the woman that the driver offered – including that she was white – and again asked if their own drivers had dealt with the same woman. These were the two replies that followed on February 11th – the last messages in this e-mail chain:
IMHO,
I am amazed that this is still an issue… let’s move along! I think we are making a mountain out of a mole hill. The unidentified woman was most likely doing the job she is emplyed [sic] to do by Wilton PS – enforcing the no idling rules to keep emissions down and avoid a dense cloud of exhaust greeting [everyone] leaving the high school. Perhaps the bus driver could have found an indoor location to wait out the meet, saving gas and abiding by the rules. Can we classify this as “water under the bridge” yet??
– – – – – –
There is a no idling policy at Wilton and I think it is important that we follow their rules since they are good enough to let us inconvenience the bus line once a month as we drop off our teams during their end of the day bus routine.
I would suggest the person may have had a bad day, or was upset about having to go out in the cold … either way it is their rule.
Sorry your drive was singled out (I haven’t heard this from any other team)
The two respondents – both of whom are white, but neither of whom lives in Wilton – assumed that the driver, who is Black, was breaking the rules, despite what the coach, who is also white, said in the e-mails. It does not appear, though, that the respondents knew the race of the driver from Stamford.
In the case of bus drivers. the law is a little more restrictive on what can be done during cold weather. Connecticut law requires that “the operator of any school bus shall not operate the engine of any school bus for more than three consecutive minutes when the school bus is not in motion”. The exceptions include “when it is necessary to operate heating, cooling or auxiliary equipment installed on the school bus when such equipment is necessary to accomplish the intended use of the school bus, including, but not limited to, the operation of safety equipment” or “when the outdoor temperature is below twenty degrees Fahrenheit”. There’s no record as to what the temperature was on that afternoon in February, although under twenty degrees is unlikely. However, the first exception is a little more nebulous. Wouldn’t the well-being of the driver, who has been entrusted to provide transportation to the team, be a priority? If this driver simply didn’t perfectly time his idling time so that it was occasionally over three minutes, is this a true violation?
In this incident, no police officer was involved – and since the woman was never identified, no further action was taken. If this hadn’t been a bus, perhaps no action would have been taken, anyway: for those driving something other than a bus, the first exception instead reads: “when it is necessary to operate defrosting, heating or cooling equipment to ensure the safety or health of the driver or passengers”. For whatever reason, the statue on buses doesn’t mention the bus driver’s health.
Five months after the incident, Wilton began an initiative to promote a no-idling policy. At the time it granted exceptions to school buses and claimed that it would not enforce the policy during winter months. (Peg Koellmer, a member of the group Wilton Go Green, went as far as to say, “When the outdoor temperatures are below 20 degrees, you can idle your brains out.”) However, to promote an event in town that November on the topic – including the showing of a film called “Idle Threat: Man on Emissions” – Good Morning Wilton’s website posted an article saying that “school bus drivers … may be ticketed for prolonged idling, while drivers of idling passenger vehicles are not subject to a fine.”
At the same time, Wilton has made headlines over a couple of race-related incidents – including one at Wilton High School the next year. During a football game against Danbury, young fans of Wilton’s football team started chanting “Build a wall”. The school’s student government later issued an apology on behalf of the student body – while claiming that the chant was being “solely used to cheer on the football team’s defense.” In June of this year, residents of both Wilton and New Canaan participated in marches against racism – an encouraging sign of possible change taking place.
We reached out to Will Haskell’s re-election campaign by e-mail this week for clarification on his stances, but did not receive a reply by Friday evening. While he has not been talking at length about idling since his letter from February, the question remains as to whether or not his position has changed since then. Much has been written about “driving while Black”, and there has even been at least once case described as “parking while Black“. Now steps may be needed to ensure that “idling while Black” isn’t next.